Motivation. Social choice is about converting many people’s preferences into one big social preference. This is obviously how many collective decision making works: elections, markets, auctions, govn’t policty, etc. The problem is, as we will prove, social choice is really hard, and it’s really hard to avoid dictatorships. But there are mechanisms to avoid this too.

Formalizing Social Choice

def. Social Choice Situation. We have to choose between candidates (=alternatives) in set :

  • An ordering .
  • . It is simply a permutation set on , thus
  • There are voters. Each voter has one ordering .
  • def. Social Welfare Function i.e. given everybody’s prefs, come up with a collective pref
  • def. Social Choice Function i.e. given everybody’s prefs, come up with a collective single candidate Two functions have a simple distinction:
  • Welfare function: full ordering, collectively.
  • Choice function: just choose one collectively. We first discuss the welfare function in detail.

Impossibility (Welfare)

Properties of a social welfare function are:

  1. Unanimity: if all voters have the same preference , then that is the collective order too.
  2. Dictatorship: if voter ’s preferences are just taken as the collective order, disregarding everybody else’s preferences, it’s a dictatorship. Dictator : just take
  3. Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA). Let candidates and preferences of voters ””, and observe which .
    1. Suppose we create a new rankings , where each voter voted and maintains their preference ranking of and in the new ranking:
    2. Then collective ranking between and should also be maintained: thm. Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem. Every social welfare function over choices , that satisfies unanimity and IIA, must be a dictatorship. Proof.